This is consistent with a string of California Supreme Court cases going back years and including ones as recent as November. Not a surprise to me (as you may have read), but expect shock-and-awe "updates" from the panic marketing firms tomorrow.
For more, as always, check out The UCL Practitioner, who has been following the Prop. 64 issue like no one else.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ec6/b3ec6ac15deab3ae51ea33003aa3585efe058e18" alt=""